OK, let me first acknowledge right up front: this project is eminently impractical. For one thing, there’s the price: replacing a paper process with at least four Origamis (plus other support hardware) is just a bit pricey. And for another thing, many of the target end users are just a bit suspicious of and even opposed to technological solutions. They think the paper processes are working just fine, thank you very much. (Though as someone who occasionally has to process their paperwork, let me tell you: it ain’t easy, and often their handwriting and habits complicate my job.)

Still, inspired by Epee Bill, I had this vision. And I really do think it would be a vast improvement over the paper processes, if people would accept it. Just imagine...

Mr. Vesper stands beside the fencing strip. In his hands is an Origami: somewhat heavier than the clipboard he once would have carried, but not much larger. On the Origami screen are the names of two fencers. He calls them: "Up next. Mr. Smith. Mr. Bolakowski." The fencers enter the strip, Smith on the right and Bolakowski on the left, and hook up to their wires. Then they present their weapons to Mr. Vesper. He tests each one, and then with his finger makes two "check" gestures on the Origami to indicate that the weapons passed inspection.

Mr. Vesper returns to the sideline and calls out: "Fencers ready..." The combatants assume their en garde positions. "Fence!" The wireless microphone he wears picks up this command and starts the fencing clock, as the fencers approach each other. (If Mr. Vesper preferred not to wear the mike, he could also start the clock by pressing a button on the Origami.) The fencers engage. Beat, beat, beat, feint, attempted parry, disengage, lunge! The scoring box lights up with one light, and Mr. Vesper calls "Halt!" Ideally, the scoring box automatically stopped the fencing clock; but since most scoring boxes aren’t capable of that, Mr. Vesper can also stop the clock via voice or button. Mr. Vesper calls the action, and then records a touch left by making a downstroke gesture in a box near Mr. Bolakowski’s name. The Origami acknowledges by announcing, "Touch, Bolakowski. Score is 1, 0." Meanwhile, the Origami uses WiFi to update the tournament server; and then the server posts the results live to the tournament’s Web site. One of the tournament workers is also wandering around between the strips, using another Origami to record live video and stream it to the server and from there to the site. Fencers and fans from all over the world can follow the tournament in real time. A tournament monitor near the bout table shows the live results. It has a touch screen (in fact, it’s really a larger Tablet PC device being used as a kiosk) so that spectators and fencers can navigate to different pages and check current standings. (This will, I hope, keep them from coming to the bout table and distracting us from our work by asking, "So if I win my next bout, who will I face after that?" Or "So is this an A tournament?" [Like I know how to answer that.] On the other hand, this system will do so much of my work, so I may have time for questions.)

Mr. Vesper repeats, "Fencers ready... Fence," and the clock and the action start again. Thrust, retreat, thrust, retreat, ballestra-lunge! And the scoring box lights up with one white light. Off target. Mr. Vesper calls the action and records the off target by making a downstroke in a different box (colored white to match the white off-target light). The Origami announces, "Off target, Bolakowski. Score is 1, 0."

"Fencers ready... Fence!" Taking a more aggressive tact, Mr. Bolakowski almost immediately leaps into a fleche. But his timing is off, and he ends up colliding with Mr. Smith. Mr. Vesper calls, "Halt! Red card." And he makes a downstroke in a third box (colored red for penalties). The Origami needs more information, so it pops up a list of possible reasons for the penalty, and Mr. Vesper checks the one that says, "Corps a corps." The Origami announces, "Red card. Bolakowski. Score is 1, 1."

Chastened, Mr. Bolakowski falls back into a more defensive mode. He and Mr. Smith trade thrusts and parries and occasional points back and forth, but the action slows. Eventually, the fencing clock runs out, and the Origami announces, "Time." Mr. Vesper calls halt, and then says, "Victory to Mr. Bolakowski, 4-3." The Origami has already figured this out for itself; but since no result is official until a director confirms it, the Origami presents the results to him. He makes a check gesture, and the official results are sent to the server and the Web. Immediately his Origami screen displays the next bout, and he calls it out: "Fencing, Emerson, Jones." Mr. Jones is not immediately available for some reason, so the Origami begins a countdown clock. If he doesn’t arrive in time, he’ll forfeit.

When the last pool bout of the event is complete, the server immediately produces a seed page and also an elimination table. It also pushes the list of elimination bouts out to the directors’ Origamis. The software on the Origamis knows that these are elimination bouts, so it changes the way it keeps time: elimination bouts run to 15 points, and are stopped every three minutes for a one minute break.

Now again, I know this is impractical, probably for more reasons than I have identified. (Flashing blades and computer equipment may be a bad combination.) And while I do think Microsoft could be interested in unusual showcases for their devices as a way to get publicity, I’m not sure that getting involved with fencing is the way to do it, at least not in America: in a country where competitive hot dog eating is actually broadcast on ESPN, fencing can’t get any air time. But boy, would I love to see it in operation! And I could write practically this whole system by myself, without a whole lot of work; and I could teach a team how to write it in under a week. I just have no confidence I’ll ever persuade anyone to let me. But I can dream...

Of course, there are other sports that could make good showcases. I’m thinking that the American biggies – football, basketball, and baseball – would make poor showcases. The fields of play are too large, and officials are too distant from the action, so no one would ever see the Origamis. So that hints at what would make a good showcase sport: one with a smaller playing field, with probably only a small number of participants (two, or maybe four), and where the officials are fairly close to the action so that the Origami will be in the camera shot quite often.

Tennis, anyone?

UPDATE: Fixed the score, thanks to Epee Bill.